Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fernando Nasser
Subject Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal
Date
Msg-id 3B7006A3.EDC8594F@redhat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal  (Alex Pilosov <alex@pilosoft.com>)
Responses Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal
List pgsql-hackers
Tom,

If we have WITH NOOID, why not having a WITH OID32 and WITH OID64 (or
something of a sort)
as well (being OID32 the default and OID an alias to it)?  
The last would not be available on some systems 
(who will use a system that does not support long long as a database
server anyway?)

The wire protocol will always handle the (tableoid) long form,
references will always store
the long form...  The OID32 would exist only to allow people to save
space in tables that need
OIDs but not the 64 bit version.



-- 
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd.                     E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neil Tiffin
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: OID wraparound: summary and proposal
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: OID wraparound: summary and proposal