:-)
Thats cool. Sometimes it's hard to tell. It's not like you can ask
"Hey guys, can I post about this nifty XYZ article I found? If you say
no, I won't. I promise. Whoops, too late."
So far as I've seen, things you've posted have been relevant. That
article was about larger software projects and their maturement times.
PostgreSQL *is* a larger software project. Bingo, it fits.
:)
Regards and best wishes,
+ Justin
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > Nice article about good software taking ten years to develop. I think
> > > PostgreSQL can be classed at 15 years now, and it is being developed at
> > > Internet speed too:
> > > http://www.joelonsoftware.com/stories/storyReader$368
> >
> > I think the slashdot discussion is more interesting than the original
> > article:
> >
> > http://slashdot.org/developers/01/07/19/0145222.shtml
> >
> > In particular, the slashdotters observe that there's more than one
> > kind of software. For big projects, ten years seems about right...
>
> I am never sure if posting info about appropriate articles is ok for
> this list.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
