Re: pg_index.indislossy - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hannu Krosing
Subject Re: pg_index.indislossy
Date
Msg-id 3B002524.6A8C33E8@tm.ee
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_index.indislossy  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_index.indislossy  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> Can someone tell me what we use indislossy for? 

IIRC it means that if you get something by this index you must check
again in the actual data 

I think that at least the GIST intarray (actually intset) methods use
it.

So you probably should _not_ remove it ;)

------------------
Hannu


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Martín Marqués
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.2 items
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.2 items