Re: Unsigned int functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: Unsigned int functions
Date
Msg-id 3AC424FB.33264C61@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unsigned int functions  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> If general opinion is that unsigned types should not be part of
> postgres, I'll have to look at turning them into a contrib type. Please
> let me know.

Providing them as a contrib/ package will allow you to provide the
*full* complement of cross-type conversion and operator functions
without worrying about bloat. Tom Lane has shown how to use entry points
on shared libraries to start us thinking about how to provide better
package integration, which should allow us to reduce the distinction
between contrib/ and standard features.

This would be a great package to develop these additional package
support features for 7.2 (hint hint ;)
                      - Thomas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [SQL] possible row locking bug in 7.0.3 & 7.1
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Error in the date field (with NULL value...).Thanks!