Re: Horology regress test changed? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: Horology regress test changed?
Date
Msg-id 3A08C12C.3C428515@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Horology regress test changed?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I did, but the log didn't say anything about unfixed regression test
> cases.  If you're going to leave some platform-specific comparison
> files un-updated, I think it'd be polite to warn people about that
> explicitly... probably on pghackers, not just committers...

*sigh*

I'll probably always leave some platform-specific comparison files
unupdated, and I would expect others to have to do that also. I
apparently did not meet your expectations on this, but it is quite in
line with our accepted practices.

Sorry for the heart stoppage when you saw your regression tests suddenly
failing...

> I have updated horology-no-DST-before-1970.out, but that still leaves
> us needing updates for horology-1947-PDT.out and
> horology-solaris-1947.out.

I guess that we have already heard from someone on one of those, and the
others will come with time.

Regards.
                      - Thomas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Text concat problem
Next
From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Date:
Subject: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherite d from template1