Tom Lane wrote:
> What really got my ire up was that this change was committed several
> days *after* core had agreed that 7.0.3 was frozen and ready to go except
> for updating the changelog, and that it was committed with no prior
Now that I've seen the back story, I must agree.
> The early returns from pghackers seem to be that people favor just
> dropping the script into /contrib and not worrying about how well
> tested/documented it is. If that's the consensus then I'll shut up
> ... but I do *not* like the way this was handled.
Bruce I believe has made a good call -- it goes in contrib for now, and
gets yanked for 7.1, which _might_ have the same functionality as a
pg_dump/pg_dumpall option (which will then get wrung out on beta
testing).
But I agree -- I'm not thrilled with the method.
The functionality itself sounds nice -- but I know we need a solid 7.0.3
out. New functionality belongs in 7.1. Until beta -- and then a freeze
there.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
