Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Chris Bitmead
Subject Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others
Date
Msg-id 3999F719.D74008DE@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others  ("Dan Browning" <danb@cyclonecomputers.com>)
List pgsql-general
Ned Lilly wrote:
>
> Er... let me put it this way.  Proprietary 2 prefers to run on Windows NT.

The performance is so bad it must be MS-Access :-).

> Chris Bitmead wrote:
>
> > That's very helpful. Can you also tell us if Proprietry 1 or Proprietry
> > 2 was definitely NOT MS-SQL Server?

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: George Robinson II
Date:
Subject: Referential integrity
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Search (select) options