Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Chris Bitmead
Subject Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others
Date
Msg-id 3999DA5A.63DE6FAA@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others  ("Dan Browning" <danb@cyclonecomputers.com>)
List pgsql-general
Ned Lilly wrote:
>
> Oh, Dan, I'm not that clever... ;-)
>
> But I *can* tell you that the market leading proprietary RDBMS products we
> tested were not IBM, Informix, or Sybase.

That's very helpful. Can you also tell us if Proprietry 1 or Proprietry
2 was definitely NOT MS-SQL Server?

>
> Regards,
> Ned
>
> Dan Browning wrote:
>
> > > Can you tell us what version of the (ahem) unnamed
> > > proprietary products
> > > you used? :-). For example if you used version 8i of an unnamed
> > > proprietry product, that might be informative :-).
> >
> > Oh, but even if you can't tell us what version was used, I'm sure you could
> > tell us that story about the monster you saw last week.  But which monster
> > was it?  Was it the monster that ATE EYEs?  And I remember you once said
> > there was a second monster, could you describe it as well?

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "J. Mauricio Cuenca H."
Date:
Subject: Problems after installing
Next
From: g
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dumpall problems