Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ned Lilly
Subject Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others
Date
Msg-id 3999CB2A.D77425D7@greatbridge.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others  ("Dan Browning" <danb@cyclonecomputers.com>)
List pgsql-general
"Ross J. Reedstrom" wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 12:21:25PM -0400, Ned Lilly wrote:
> > Oh, Dan, I'm not that clever... ;-)
> >
> > But I *can* tell you that the market leading proprietary RDBMS products we
> > tested were not IBM, Informix, or Sybase.
> >
>
> And in reply to the MySQL version comment/question, Ned said:
>  "We only used the released versions of each database."
>
> I took that to mean they used the latest released version of each
> database.  One thing I couldn't deduce: which operating system where the
> commercial RDBMs run on top of? NT for one of them, for sure, but the
> other can probably run on either of the quoted OSs. If it was run on NT,
> we might be seeing the linux vs. NT effect.

One of them ran on NT, the other four ran on Red Hat Linux 6.1.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: mjp@ornl.gov
Date:
Subject: Re: bytea question
Next
From: Franck Martin
Date:
Subject: Building a library for PG