Re: [HACKERS] Installing PL/pgSQL by default - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Installing PL/pgSQL by default
Date
Msg-id 3979.1260198221@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Installing PL/pgSQL by default  (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Installing PL/pgSQL by default  (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>)
List pgsql-general
Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com> writes:
> So should the decision to remove plpgsql be on the hosting platform
> hands or the hosted database owner?

Why not?  If they really want to prohibit use of a feature the upstream
project has decided should be standard, that's their privilege.
The argument against seems to be basically "this should work exactly
like it did before", but if that's the standard then we can never
have plpgsql installed by default at all.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Raymond O'Donnell
Date:
Subject: Re: Error_startup postgresql server
Next
From: "Daniel Verite"
Date:
Subject: Re: Error_startup postgresql server