Re: Patch for better large objects support - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Chris Bitmead
Subject Re: Patch for better large objects support
Date
Msg-id 3945F4A7.6D71B2E6@bitmead.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Patch for better large objects support  (Denis Perchine <dyp@perchine.com>)
Responses Re: Patch for better large objects support  (Denis Perchine <dyp@perchine.com>)
List pgsql-patches
> > Will anybody want to use this when TOAST comes to be?
>
> 1. There's no any TOAST at the moment.

I wasn't implying the patch is bad. Only wondering out load if toast
will be a super-set of large objects.

> 2. For really large objects TOAST will be really inefficient for quite small < 64K other
> way around.

Why will toast be inefficient for really large objects?

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Denis Perchine
Date:
Subject: Patch 0.2 for Re: [HACKERS] Caching number of blocks in relation to avoi lseek.
Next
From: Denis Perchine
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for better large objects support