Re: Patch for better large objects support - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Denis Perchine
Subject Re: Patch for better large objects support
Date
Msg-id 00061315544706.00525@dyp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch for better large objects support  (Chris Bitmead <chris@bitmead.com>)
List pgsql-patches
> > > Will anybody want to use this when TOAST comes to be?
> >
> > 1. There's no any TOAST at the moment.
>
> I wasn't implying the patch is bad. Only wondering out load if toast
> will be a super-set of large objects.

Not exactly.

> > 2. For really large objects TOAST will be really inefficient for quite small < 64K other
> > way around.
>
> Why will toast be inefficient for really large objects?

Because data is stored in relations, and there's extra overhead for managing them.
Just look on Jan's mail in [HACKERS] for better description of the difference.

--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine

----------------------------------
E-Mail: dyp@perchine.com
HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/
FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5
----------------------------------

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Chris Bitmead
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for better large objects support
Next
From: Chris Bitmead
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for better large objects support