Re: bugzilla (Was: What do you want me to do?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: bugzilla (Was: What do you want me to do?)
Date
Msg-id 3926.1068266185@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bugzilla (Was: What do you want me to do?)  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: bugzilla (Was: What do you want me to do?)  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> The last comment on the bug page says:

> "The Red Hat guys did a quick 'n dirty port.  It works, but doesn't
> quite make use of the best of PostgreSQL.  Also, their tarball is out
> of date with the current schema used by Bugzilla."

> The bug is actually assigned to David Lawrence at RedHat - maybe you'd
like to get some status from him? :-)

Dave is the guy who did the aforementioned quick-n-dirty port.  AFAIK
he doesn't really have time to do the wholesale redesign that the
Bugzilla developers have decided they need to have any database
independence.

The "doesn't quite make the best use of PG" quote is one of the best
examples of buck-passing I've seen in awhile.  If Bugzilla had been
designed with some thought to DB independence to start with, we'd not
be having this discussion.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: What do you want me to do?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Making PostgreSQL 7.4 (CVS) work properly on OS X 10.3 (7B85)