Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: Code of Conduct plan - Mailing list pgsql-general

From gilberto.castillo@etecsa.cu
Subject Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: Code of Conduct plan
Date
Msg-id 38e7cd6eab4e425de8e47504385faf0d@etecsa.cu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Code of Conduct plan  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
El 2018-06-04 12:52, Joshua D. Drake escribió:
> On 06/03/2018 11:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Code_of_Conduct
>> 
>> We are now asking for a final round of community comments.
>> Please send any public comments to the pgsql-general list (only).
>> If you wish to make a private comment, you may send it to
>> coc@postgresql.org.
> 
> Thanks for all the efforts on this. It is nice to see us explicitly
> moving toward modernizing our community policies and creating an
> openly inclusive community. There are a couple of notes I have about
> this:
> 
> I think we need language that explicitly states that this is about
> participation within postgresql.org only. It is not postgresql.org's
> mission or purpose to police actions outside of their domain. The
> following minor modification would work:
> 
> "To that end, we have established this Code of Conduct for community
> interaction and participation within the Postgresql.org project."
> 
> There is no language that protects different political or social
> views. In today's climate it is important especially as we are a
> worldwide project. Something simple like the following should be
> enough:
> 
> "Examples of personal characteristics include, but are not limited to
> age, race, national origin or ancestry, religion, political
> affiliation, social class, gender, or sexual orientation."

i don't know, because a check "Your agree ours rules", may enough.

Categorize, we will can have different interpretation.
> JD


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Code of Conduct plan
Next
From: Michael Nolan
Date:
Subject: Microsoft buys GitHub, is this a threat to open-source