On 11/06/2021 18:31, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jason Kim <git@jasonk.me> writes:
>> In the middle of GIN index testing, there are some selects that are on
>> a different table array_op_test that doesn't even have an index. They
>> probably were supposed to be selects to table array_index_op_test like
>> the other ones around the area.
>
> I think it's probably intentional, else why have two tables at all?
> I suppose the point of these test cases is to confirm that you get the
> same results with or without use of an index.
We already have these same queries in the 'arrays' test against the
'array_op_test' table, though. It sure looks like a copy-paste error to
me as well.
- Heikki
