Re: InitPostgres and flatfiles question - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: InitPostgres and flatfiles question
Date
Msg-id 3845.24.211.165.134.1168054828.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: InitPostgres and flatfiles question  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>>>> What value is allowing multiple queies via PQexec()
>>>
>>> The only argument I can think of is that it allows applications to be
>>> sloppy about parsing a SQL script into individual commands before they
>>> send it.  (I think initdb may be guilty of exactly that BTW...)  At the
>>> same time you could argue that such sloppiness is inherently a Bad
>>> Idea.


initdb doesn't use libpq at all ... are you saying it should only pass
individual statements to the backend? Adding smarts to enable that would
add complexity without any benefit I can see.

cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] A patch to pg_regress for Windows port
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] wal_checksum = on (default) | off