Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off
Date
Msg-id 25996.1168055852@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off  (Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off
Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off
List pgsql-patches
Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org> writes:
> On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:30 AM, Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD wrote:
>> Ok, so when you need CRC's on a replicate (but not on the master) you

> Which sounds to me like a good reason to allow the option in
> recovery.conf as well...

Actually, I'm not seeing the use-case for a slave having a different
setting from the master at all?

    "My backup server is less reliable than the primary."

    "My backup server is more reliable than the primary."

Somehow, neither of these statements seem likely to be uttered by
a sane DBA ...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Put back ERANGE test in dpow().
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Put back ERANGE test in