Re: change name of redirect_stderr? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Brendan Jurd
Subject Re: change name of redirect_stderr?
Date
Msg-id 37ed240d0708141311m3085ec6dn5f9ca420172069af@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: change name of redirect_stderr?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: change name of redirect_stderr?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Re: change name of redirect_stderr?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 8/15/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> For example, "log_line_prefix" is misnamed under this rule, and ought to
> be "logging_line_prefix".  Similarly, redirect_stderr would become
> "logging_something" --- I'd prefer "logging_start_collector" but could
> live with "logging_collector" (or maybe "logging_use_collector"?)
>

The consistent prefix idea sounds good; does "logging_enable" jive
with your proposal?

Introduction of the term "collector" might be an overthink, and could
confuse people.  Your average postgres user tweaking his config file
is going to see that and wonder what on earth a "log collector" is.

Whereas it's generally understood that to "log" is to capture output
and make it persistent, and "logging_enable" is clearly a setting that
allows this to take place.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: change name of redirect_stderr?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: tsearch2 in PostgreSQL 8.3?