Re: Enable data checksums by default - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Enable data checksums by default
Date
Msg-id 37c96baa-d715-4d5c-99e8-c2f5727f2586@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Enable data checksums by default  (Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Enable data checksums by default
List pgsql-hackers
On 27.08.24 15:44, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 3:46 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com 
> <mailto:nathandbossart@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Should we error if both --data-checksum and --no-data-checksums are
>     specified?  IIUC with 0001, we'll use whichever is specified last.
> 
> 
> Hmmm, that is a good question. We have never (to my recollection) 
> flipped a default quite like this before. I'm inclined to leave it as 
> "last one wins", as I can see automated systems appending their desired 
> selection to the end of the arg list, and expecting it to work.

Yes, last option wins is the normal expected behavior.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions