On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Joshua Tolley
<eggyknap@gmail.com> wrote:
Way back in this thread[1] one of the arguments against allowing
some version of CREATE SYNONYM was that we couldn't create a synonym for
an object in a remote database. Will the SQL/MED work make this sort of
thing a possibility? I realize since it's not standard anyway, there's
still a discussion or two to be had about how precisely it should work,
but thought I'd raise the possibility.
While shaking my head In that movie-like slow-motion used as a precursor to an almost disastrous event, I see myself saying, "nooooooooooooo..."
OK, back to reality.
SQL/MED does support foreign tables, which are basically synonyms for remote tables. Other than that, it has no real similarity to synonym behavior for other database objects such as views, functions, or local tables.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA
myYearbook.com
