Re: Block-level CRC checks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jonah H. Harris
Subject Re: Block-level CRC checks
Date
Msg-id 36e682920810020748k93993bm5d7da9dbc923e08@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Block-level CRC checks  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Block-level CRC checks
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Not checksumming the hint bits *is* a solution to the torn page problem.
>
> Yeah, but it has enough drawbacks that I'd like to keep looking for
> alternatives.

Agreed.

> One argument that I've not seen raised is that not checksumming the hint
> bits leaves you open to a single-bit error that incorrectly sets a hint
> bit.

Agreed.

-- 
Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA
myYearbook.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Next
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks