Re: Block-level CRC checks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Block-level CRC checks
Date
Msg-id 29733.1222958480@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Block-level CRC checks  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Block-level CRC checks
List pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The problem we still have to solve is torn pages when writing back a
>> hint-bit update ...

> Not checksumming the hint bits *is* a solution to the torn page problem.

Yeah, but it has enough drawbacks that I'd like to keep looking for
alternatives.

One argument that I've not seen raised is that not checksumming the hint
bits leaves you open to a single-bit error that incorrectly sets a hint
bit.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow pg_regress to be run outside the build tree.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks