Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Jonah H. Harris
Subject Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle
Date
Msg-id 36e682920706181116n34de2d87i2566fb920be37909@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle  (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle
List pgsql-advocacy
On 6/18/07, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca> wrote:
> It would appear that this was the flame-fest that was predicted.
> Particularly as this has been copied to five lists.  If you all want
> to have an argument about what Oracle should or should not do, could
> you at least limit it to one list?

Yeah, Josh B. asked it to be toned down to the original list which
should've been involved.  Which I think should be pgsql-admin or
pgsql-advocacy... your thoughts?

I think the Oracle discussion is over, David T. just needs URL references IMHO.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation            | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor            | jharris@enterprisedb.com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830            | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Kostyrka
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle
Next
From: Andreas Kostyrka
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle