Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [PERFORM] Postgres VS Oracle - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Andreas Kostyrka
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [PERFORM] Postgres VS Oracle
Date
Msg-id 4676C802.9090401@kostyrka.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [PERFORM] Postgres VS Oracle  ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Jonah H. Harris wrote:
>
> All of us have noticed the anti-MySQL bashing based on problems with
> MySQL 3.23... Berkus and others (including yourself, if I am correct),
> have corrected people on not making invalid comparisons against
> ancient versions.  I'm only doing the same where Oracle, IBM, and
> Microsoft are concerned.
>

My, my, I fear my asbestos are trying to feel warm inside ;)

Well, there is not much MySQL bashing going around. And MySQL 5 has
enough "features" and current MySQL AB support for it is so "good", that
there is no need to bash MySQL based on V3 problems. MySQL5 is still a
joke, and one can quite safely predict the answers to tickets, with well
over 50% guess rate.

(Hint: I don't consider the answer: "Redo your schema" to be a
satisfactory answer. And philosophically, the query optimizer in MySQL
is near perfect. OTOH, considering the fact that many operations in
MySQL still have just one way to execute, it's easy to choose the
fastest plan, isn't it *g*)

Andreas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGdsgCHJdudm4KnO0RAg2oAKCdabTyQCcK8eC0+ErVJLlX59nNjgCfQjaO
hhfSxBoESyCU/mTQo3gbQRM=
=RqB7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [PERFORM] Postgres VS Oracle
Next
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [pgsql-advocacy] [PERFORM] Postgres VS Oracle