Re: cost per transaction - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Jonah H. Harris
Subject Re: cost per transaction
Date
Msg-id 36e682920704200631p4fc95779q9fb98abf1e4873c9@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to cost per transaction  (Federico <rotellaro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: cost per transaction  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On 4/20/07, Federico <rotellaro@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm writing the slides for the road2pgday and I'm wondering if there's
> some test about the cost per transaction that have PostgreSQL on OLTP.

AFAIK, there aren't any audited public benchmarks for PostgreSQL.  So,
you're not going to find a TPC-C or TPC-E for PostgreSQL yet.  There
may have been one of the SPEC benchmarks that used PostgreSQL, but
that wouldn't have been direct OLTP.

Being free, PostgreSQL's cost-per-transaction would be fairly low.
Basically, if you purchase maintenance, support, installation, or
tuning services from a PostgreSQL support organization or consultant,
then you're cost/transaction is really based on that fee and the
number of your applications transactions run over the lifetime of the
support contract.

Unlike other database vendors, there's no cost/transaction for free PostgreSQL.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation            | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor            | jharris@enterprisedb.com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830            | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Federico
Date:
Subject: cost per transaction
Next
From: Chris Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: cost per transaction