Re: GUC names in messages - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Lakhin
Subject Re: GUC names in messages
Date
Msg-id 36ba4d1b-bc80-e3e2-287f-aacd3199c3d7@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GUC names in messages  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello Peter,

[ sorry for the kind of off-topic ]

17.05.2024 14:57, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I committed your 0001 and 0002 now, with some small fixes.
>
> There has also been quite a bit of new code, of course, since you posted your patches, so we'll probably find a few 
> more things that could use adjustment.
>
> I'd be happy to consider the rest of your patch set after beta1 and/or for PG18.

While translating messages, I've encountered a weird message, updated by
17974ec25:
     printf(_("(in \"wal_sync_method\" preference order, except fdatasync is Linux's default)\n"));

Does "except ..." make sense here or it's just a copy-and-paste from docs?:
         The default is the first method in the above list that is supported
         by the platform, except that <literal>fdatasync</literal> is the default on
         Linux and FreeBSD.

Best regards,
Alexander



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: GetRelationPath() vs critical sections
Next
From: Maxim Orlov
Date:
Subject: Re: Test 041_checkpoint_at_promote.pl faild in installcheck due to missing injection_points