Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas G. Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h
Date
Msg-id 3638B1DA.9C1A363F@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> points to a nonexistent operator --- there is no oid8ne in pg_proc, 
> nor in the code... anyone feel like fixing it?

You de man! I just committed inet regression test fixes and resolved the
"@" operator problem. I'm back to working on docs for now...
                 - Tom

actually, at the moment I'm back to going to work :)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items
Next
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/include/catalog pg_operator.h'