Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h
Date
Msg-id 4858.909679966@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Yes.  See include/catalog/template1_check.sql.  Uses SQL to do checks.

Hmm.  OK, that script has some overlap with what I did last night.
But is it run automatically?  I think putting the checks into a
regression test is a better plan.

Also, in playing around with template1_check.sql, I discovered that
pg_operator OID 644

DATA(insert OID = 644 (  "<>"       PGUID 0 b t f  30  30  16 644 649  0  0 oid8ne neqsel neqjoinsel ));

points to a nonexistent operator --- there is no oid8ne in pg_proc, nor
in the code... anyone feel like fixing it?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vince Vielhaber
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/include/catalog pg_operator.h'
Next
From: "Taral"
Date:
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items