On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:59, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> 1. I thought we'd agreed at
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-10/msg00558.php
> that the patch should support WITH on DML statements, eg
> with (some-query) insert into foo ...
> This might not take much more than grammar additions, but it's
> definitely lacking at the moment.
Hrm ? A few messages down you say SELECT should be a good start
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-10/msg01081.php
> 2. The handling of rules on DML WITH queries is far short of sufficient.
Ick.
> Perhaps it would be acceptable to just throw ERROR_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED
> when there are DO ALSO or conditional DO INSTEAD rules applying to the
> target of a DML WITH query.
+1
> 3. I'm pretty unimpressed with the code added to ExecutePlan.
> I wonder whether it would be practical to fix both #2 and #3 by having the
> representation of DML WITH queries look more like the representation of
> rule rewrite output
Interesting... This seems like the best solution ( assuming its
workable ). It also looks like it might make #1 easier as well.
However, I think the current approach does have some virtue in that I
was surprised how little the patch was. Granted that is partly due to
ExecutePlan knowing to much.
