Re: plperl and inline functions -- first draft - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua Tolley
Subject Re: plperl and inline functions -- first draft
Date
Msg-id 20091129222908.GN3803@eddie
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plperl and inline functions -- first draft  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:15:40PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joshua Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com> writes:
> > Makes sense on both counts. Thanks for the help. How does the attached look?
>
> Applied with minor corrections, mainly around the state save/restore
> logic.  I also put in some code to fix the memory leak noted by Tim Bunce,
> but am waiting for some confirmation that it's right before
> back-patching the pre-existing bug of the same ilk.
>
>             regards, tom lane

Yay, and thanks. For the record, I'm can't claim to know whether your fix is
the Right Thing or not, so I'm witholding comment.

--
Joshua Tolley / eggyknap
End Point Corporation
http://www.endpoint.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions
Next
From: Alex Hunsaker
Date:
Subject: Re: Writeable CTE patch