On 4/11/21 12:51 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 at 12:43, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
> <mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>> wrote:
>
> I wrote:
> > Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com <mailto:mail@joeconway.com>> writes:
> >> Would an equivalent "PGWARNING" be something we are open to adding and
> >> back-patching?
>
> > It's not real obvious how pl/r could solve this in a reliable way
> > otherwise, so adding that would be OK with me, but I wonder whether
> > back-patching is going to help you any. You'd still need to compile
> > against older headers I should think. So I'd suggest
> > (1) add PGWARNING in HEAD only
>
> Concretely, maybe like the attached?
>
>
> +1 from me.
> I especially like the changes to the comments as it's more apparent what they
> should be used for.
+1
Looks great to me.
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
