On Sep 2, 2009, at 5:07 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> One reason I don't like this proposal is that postgresql does not
> preserve the original 'create view' statement for editing. The
> resulting sql that is given to you to edit is hopelessly mangled and I
> think it's not good to encourage people to modify views in this
> fashion.
>
> Then again, we are only reproducing what pgadmin can already do, so
> why not? :-)
Is there any reason that the CREATE VIEW output to pg_dump and,
presumably, \ev, couldn't be refactored to pretty-print the VIEW
declaration?
Best,
David
