Re: Need for speed - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Alex Turner
Subject Re: Need for speed
Date
Msg-id 33c6269f050816105957ae5d6f@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Need for speed  (Ulrich Wisser <ulrich.wisser@relevanttraffic.se>)
Responses Re: Need for speed
List pgsql-performance
Are you calculating aggregates, and if so, how are you doing it (I ask
the question from experience of a similar application where I found
that my aggregating PGPLSQL triggers were bogging the system down, and
changed them so scheduled jobs instead).

Alex Turner
NetEconomist

On 8/16/05, Ulrich Wisser <ulrich.wisser@relevanttraffic.se> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> one of our services is click counting for on line advertising. We do
> this by importing Apache log files every five minutes. This results in a
> lot of insert and delete statements. At the same time our customers
> shall be able to do on line reporting.
>
> We have a box with
> Linux Fedora Core 3, Postgres 7.4.2
> Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz
> 2 scsi 76GB disks (15.000RPM, 2ms)
>
> I did put pg_xlog on another file system on other discs.
>
> Still when several users are on line the reporting gets very slow.
> Queries can take more then 2 min.
>
> I need some ideas how to improve performance in some orders of
> magnitude. I already thought of a box with the whole database on a ram
> disc. So really any idea is welcome.
>
> Ulrich
>
>
>
> --
> Ulrich Wisser  / System Developer
>
> RELEVANT TRAFFIC SWEDEN AB, Riddarg 17A, SE-114 57 Sthlm, Sweden
> Direct (+46)86789755 || Cell (+46)704467893 || Fax (+46)86789769
> ________________________________________________________________
> http://www.relevanttraffic.com
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>        subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>        message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Michael Stone
Date:
Subject: Re: [SPAM?] Re: PG8 Tuning
Next
From: mudfoot@rawbw.com
Date:
Subject: Re: choosing RAID level for xlogs