Quoting Anjan Dave <adave@vantage.com>:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> One simple question. For 125 or more checkpoint segments
> (checkpoint_timeout is 600 seconds, shared_buffers are at 21760 or
> 170MB) on a very busy database, what is more suitable, a separate 6 disk
> RAID5 volume, or a RAID10 volume? Databases will be on separate
> spindles. Disks are 36GB 15KRPM, 2Gb Fiber Channel. Performance is
> paramount, but I don't want to use RAID0.
>
RAID10 -- no question. xlog activity is overwhelmingly sequential 8KB writes.
In order for RAID5 to perform a write, the host (or controller) needs to perform
extra calculations for parity. This turns into latency. RAID10 does not
perform those extra calculations.
>
>
> PG7.4.7 on RHAS 4.0
>
>
>
> I can provide more info if needed.
>
>
>
> Appreciate some recommendations!
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Anjan
>
>
>
>
> ---
> This email message and any included attachments constitute confidential
> and privileged information intended exclusively for the listed
> addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
> Vantage by immediately telephoning 215-579-8390, extension 1158. In
> addition, please reply to this message confirming your receipt of the
> same in error. A copy of your email reply can also be sent to
> support@vantage.com. Please do not disclose, copy, distribute or take
> any action in reliance on the contents of this information. Kindly
> destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. Any other use of
> this email is prohibited. Thank you for your cooperation. For more
> information about Vantage, please visit our website at
> http://www.vantage.com <http://www.vantage.com/> .
> ---
>
>
>
>
