Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Alex Turner
Subject Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Date
Msg-id 33c6269f050110094646897c3e@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft  (Frank Wiles <frank@wiles.org>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft  (Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud<lists@boutiquenumerique.com>)
Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft  ("Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>)
List pgsql-performance
You sir are correct!  You can't use perl in MS-SQL or Oracle ;).

Alex Turner
NetEconomist


On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:42:00 -0600, Frank Wiles <frank@wiles.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:33:07 +0100
> Yann Michel <yann-postgresql@spline.de> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:07:55AM -0500, Alex Turner wrote:
> > > Neither Oracle nor MS-SQL have the range of stored procedure
> > > langauges that Postgresql supports.
> >
> > That is not true. Oracle uses PL/SQL for its stored procedures and
> > M$-SQL does have a stored procedural language.
>
>   By "range" I believe he meant number of stored procedure languages.
>   He wasn't saying they didn't have a stored procedure langauge or
>   support, just that PostgreSQL had more languages to choose from.
>
>  ---------------------------------
>    Frank Wiles <frank@wiles.org>
>    http://www.wiles.org
>  ---------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>                http://archives.postgresql.org
>

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Frank Wiles
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Next
From: Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft