Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Frank Wiles
Subject Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Date
Msg-id 20050110114200.76e9a51d.frank@wiles.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft  (Yann Michel <yann-postgresql@spline.de>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:33:07 +0100
Yann Michel <yann-postgresql@spline.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:07:55AM -0500, Alex Turner wrote:
> > Neither Oracle nor MS-SQL have the range of stored procedure
> > langauges that Postgresql supports.
>
> That is not true. Oracle uses PL/SQL for its stored procedures and
> M$-SQL does have a stored procedural language.

  By "range" I believe he meant number of stored procedure languages.
  He wasn't saying they didn't have a stored procedure langauge or
  support, just that PostgreSQL had more languages to choose from.

 ---------------------------------
   Frank Wiles <frank@wiles.org>
   http://www.wiles.org
 ---------------------------------


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Yann Michel
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Next
From: Alex Turner
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft