Re: ipcclean in 8.1 broken? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: ipcclean in 8.1 broken?
Date
Msg-id 3224.1141410476@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ipcclean in 8.1 broken?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: ipcclean in 8.1 broken?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> (I'm not finding it right now, but I'm pretty sure that the SUS
>> specifies that numeric userid == 0 for superuser, whereas "root" is not
>> required to be the name, so this would be more correct anyway.)

> Can we assume 'id' is on all unix systems?

What's your point?  The script fails anyway if that bit doesn't work.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: PG Extensions: Must be statically linked?
Next
From: Martin Pitt
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, patch take #3