Re: ipcclean in 8.1 broken? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: ipcclean in 8.1 broken?
Date
Msg-id 200603031839.k23Idtm21243@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ipcclean in 8.1 broken?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: ipcclean in 8.1 broken?
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> (I'm not finding it right now, but I'm pretty sure that the SUS
> >> specifies that numeric userid == 0 for superuser, whereas "root" is not
> >> required to be the name, so this would be more correct anyway.)
> 
> > Can we assume 'id' is on all unix systems?
> 
> What's your point?  The script fails anyway if that bit doesn't work.

Is 'id' better than what we have now if 'id' isn't widely supported?

--  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us SRA OSS, Inc.   http://www.sraoss.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Martin Pitt
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding an ignore list to pg_restore, patch take #3
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Foreign keys for non-default datatypes