Re: Corruption during WAL replay - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Corruption during WAL replay
Date
Msg-id 3173721.1648173548@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Corruption during WAL replay  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Corruption during WAL replay  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> ... So that leaves 7dac61402e, which did this to
> the test script that's failing:
 
>  use strict;
>  use warnings;
> -use Config;
>  use PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster;
>  use PostgreSQL::Test::Utils;

> Discuss.

Another thing that seems quite baffling, but is becoming clearer by
the hour, is that only serinus and dragonet are seeing this failure.
How is that?  They're not very similarly configured --- one is gcc,
one clang, and one uses jit and one doesn't.  They do share the same
perl version, 5.34.0; but so do twenty-three other animals, many of
which have reported in cleanly.  I'm at a loss to explain that.
Andres, can you think of anything that's peculiar to those two
animals?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove an unnecessary errmsg_plural in dependency.c
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Corruption during WAL replay