Re: OraToPg WAS: new project submissions on pgfoundry active? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: OraToPg WAS: new project submissions on pgfoundry active?
Date
Msg-id 315A9142-790A-4595-BF2A-0878E948DD79@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: OraToPg WAS: new project submissions on pgfoundry active?  ("Chris Mair" <list@1006.org>)
Responses Re: OraToPg WAS: new project submissions on  (Chris Mair <list@1006.org>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Mar 8, 2006, at 3:10 AM, Chris Mair wrote:

>
>>> It is completely unrelated. The name is a (confusing) coincidence.
>>
>> Can we call it something else then?   Anything else?
>
> Hi there,
>
> at last we came up with a new name: we'd like to call the project
> "protopg" (which would stand for PROprietary TO PostGresql).
> With all lowercase spelling.
>
> Josh,
> would that name qualify?

So do you intend to eventually support other databases? That'd be
cool (to say the least). How expandable is the current architecture?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461



pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL committer history?
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL committer history?