Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables
Date
Msg-id 3157.1362940373@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables  (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>)
Responses postgres_fdw vs data formatting GUCs (was Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables  (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> writes:
> [ pgsql-v9.3-writable-fdw-poc.v12.part-1/2.patch ]

Applied after rather extensive editorialization.  DELETE RETURNING in
particular was a mess, and I also tried to make SELECT FOR UPDATE behave
in what seemed like a sane fashion.

There's a lot left to do here of course.  One thing I was wondering
about was why we don't allow DEFAULTs to be attached to foreign-table
columns.  There was no use in it before, but it seems sensible enough
now.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: postgres_fdw vs data formatting GUCs (was Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables)