Re: WIP: CoC V5 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: WIP: CoC V5
Date
Msg-id 31038.1452720426@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: CoC V5  (Steve Litt <slitt@troubleshooters.com>)
Responses Re: WIP: CoC V5
List pgsql-general
Steve Litt <slitt@troubleshooters.com> writes:
> To me it's simple...
> Disallow "You <something bad>"
> Disallow "Your code <something bad>"
> Encourage "It would be better if your code <something factual> because
> <technological reason>."

That's fine as practice, but I don't think we want to get anywhere near
being that detailed in the CoC per se.  If we start trying to write that
sort of rule, the CoC will be multiple pages long and no one will read it.
(I thought Kevin's last draft was already too long.)

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: John Wiencek
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronous replication
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Data Packaging/Data Unpacking