Re: prokind column (was Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: prokind column (was Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures)
Date
Msg-id 30721.1519750231@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: prokind column (was Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures)  (Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: prokind column (was Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures)  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 4:03 AM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> I would just recommend users to use a version of psql matching
>> the one of the server instead of putting an extra load of maintenance
>> into psql for years to come

> Breaking tab completion in new psql against old servers might be
> acceptable as it's a fringe feature, but I don't think your
> recommendation of matching versions is practical. Lots of people
> manage multiple server versions and using the latest psql for all of
> them is currently, as far as I know, a perfectly supported way of
> doing that, getting new psql features and keeping compatibility. I
> think it would be a pity to loose that.

We support the various psql/describe.c features against old servers,
so it would be quite inconsistent for tab completion not to work
similarly.  There are some gaps in that already, as per the other
thread, but we should clean those up not add more.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: jsonlog logging only some messages?
Next
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: Online enabling of checksums