Re: [PATCH] get rid of StdRdOptions, use individual binary reloptions representation for each relation kind instead - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nikolay Shaplov
Subject Re: [PATCH] get rid of StdRdOptions, use individual binary reloptions representation for each relation kind instead
Date
Msg-id 3066018.uKRLcYz4iL@x200m
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] get rid of StdRdOptions, use individual binaryreloptions representation for each relation kind instead  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
В письме от пятница, 27 сентября 2019 г. 17:24:49 MSK пользователь Michael
Paquier написал:

> The patch is in this state for two months now, so I have switched it
> to "returned with feedback".

So I've split this patch into even smaller parts, so it would be more easy to
review.

Do not use StdRdOptions in Access Methods
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4127670.gFlpRb6XCm@x200m

Use empty PartitionedRelOption structure for storing partitioned table options
instead of StdRdOption
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1627387.Qykg9O6zpu@x200m

and

Some useful asserts in ViewOptions Macroses
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3634983.eHpMQ1mJnI@x200m

as for removing StdRdOptions for Heap and Toast, I would suggest for commit it
later. It is not critical for my reloptions refactoring plans. I can do it
having one structure for two relation kinds. So we can split it into two
later, or do not split at all...

--
Software Developer: https://www.upwork.com/freelancers/~014a87e140ff02c0da
Body-oriented Therapist: https://vk.com/nataraj_rebalancing  (Russian)
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nikolay Shaplov
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not use StdRdOptions in Access Methods
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: New "-b slim" option in 2019b zic: should we turn that on?