Tom Lane writes:
> The problem is that it is double-quoting a qualified name, which is
> something we generally don't produce in messages. I think it's actively
> misleading.
While I don't really agree that this is a problem, better solutions would
be to not quote the thing at all or write something like Table "%s"
(Schema "%s"). However, the message style guidelines are very clear on
this point, and before we deviate I'd like to see an adjusted proposal.
