Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use
Date
Msg-id 30536376-cb57-d233-12d4-a5d70d0349ce@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/21/18 07:48, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 3/21/18 01:51, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>>> On March 20, 2018 8:24:41 PM PDT, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>>>> Yeah, I agree with that.  Just not using stdbool.h in those cases ought
>>>> to be fine.  Any platforms where sizeof(bool) is 4 involves macos older
>>>> than 10.5 and Windows platforms using MSVC versions older than 2003
>>>> (didn't look further down either).
>>
>>> Aren't there some somewhat modern architectures where that's still the case, for performance reasons? PPC or such?
>>
>> Well, hydra (F16 on ppc64) has sizeof(bool) = 1.  Don't have any other
>> good datapoints handy.  Presumably we'd set up configure to report
>> what it found out, so it wouldn't take long to survey the buildfarm.
> 
> I've pushed the configure tests.  Let's see what they say.

So after a day, only the old macOS PowerPC systems have sizeof(bool) == 4.

I have committed the rest of this patch now.

Windows could use some manual adjustments in pg_config.h.win32 if anyone
cares.  (That file also needs some more updates.)

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables