Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v11 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v11
Date
Msg-id 30020.1520968379@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v11  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2018-03-13 14:36:44 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I realize that EXPLAIN (JIT OFF) may sound like it's intended to
>> disable JIT itself

> Yea, that's what I'm concerned about.

>> , but I think it's pretty clear that EXPLAIN (BUFFERS OFF) does not
>> disable the use of actual buffers, only the display of buffer-related
>> information.

> Hm.

FWIW, I agree with Robert's preference for just JIT here.  The "info"
bit isn't conveying anything.  And we've never had any EXPLAIN options
that actually change the behavior of the explained command, only ones
that change the amount of info displayed.  I don't see why we'd
consider JIT an exception to that.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: neqjoinsel versus "refresh materialized view concurrently"
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use