Change of behaviour of pg_get_userbyid & pg_get_viewdef - do it? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Philip Warner
Subject Change of behaviour of pg_get_userbyid & pg_get_viewdef - do it?
Date
Msg-id 3.0.5.32.20000927211012.02f9f370@mail.rhyme.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to RFC - change of behaviour of pg_get_userbyid & pg_get_viewdef?  (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Based on the lack of reaction on GENERAL and SQL, I am inclined to go ahead
with the
changes below at least as far as returning NULL instead of 'Not a View' or
'unknown (UID=<uid-number>)' (as per Tom's request), if noone objects...


At 13:15 24/09/00 +1000, Philip Warner wrote:
>
>Two routines do eccentric things when they can't find required supporting
>data:
>
>pg_get_userbyid
>
>    returns 'unknown (UID=<uid-number>)' when the UID does not exist.
>
>pg_get_viewdef
>
>    returns 'Not a view' when passed a non-existant or non-view table
>    it also signals errors when the underlying metadata can not be found.
>
>The proposal is to return NULL in the above cases - in the final case,
>probably also generate a NOTICE.
>
>Does anybody have a problem with this? Think it's a bad idea etc?
>

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|
                                 |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: devik@cdi.cz
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql is 75 times faster with my new index scan
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: There's the rub... (a meta note)