RE: Big 7.1 open items - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Don Baccus
Subject RE: Big 7.1 open items
Date
Msg-id 3.0.1.32.20000620221248.0150f610@mail.pacifier.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Big 7.1 open items  ("Philip J. Warner" <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
Responses RE: Big 7.1 open items
List pgsql-hackers
At 11:22 AM 6/21/00 +1000, Philip J. Warner wrote:

>It may be worth considering leaving the CREATE TABLE statement alone.
>Dec/RDB uses a new statement entirely to define where a table goes...

It's worth considering, but on the other hand Oracle users greatly
outnumber Compaq/RDB users these days...

If there's no SQL92 guidance for implementing a feature, I'm pretty much in
favor of tracking Oracle, whose SQL dialect is rapidly becoming a
de-facto standard. 

I'm not saying I like the fact, Oracle's a pain in the ass.  But when
adopting existing syntax, might as well adopt that of the crushing
borg.



- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert
Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Don Baccus
Date:
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items