On 10.02.22 12:08, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>> + errhint("Rebuild all objects affected by collation in the template database and run "
>> + "ALTER DATABASE %s REFRESH COLLATION VERSION, "
>> + "or build PostgreSQL with the right library version.",
>> + quote_identifier(dbtemplate))));
>
> After a second read I think the messages are slightly ambiguous. What do you
> think about specifying the problematic collation name and provider?
>
> For now we only support libc default collation so users will probably have to
> reindex almost everything on that database (not sure if the versioning is more
> fine grained on Windows), but we should probably still specify "affected by
> libc collation" in the errhint so they have a chance to avoid unnecessary
> reindex.
I think accurate would be something like "objects using the default
collation", since objects using a specific collation are not meant, even
if they use the same provider.
>> +/*
>> + * ALTER DATABASE name REFRESH COLLATION VERSION
>> + */
>> +ObjectAddress
>> +AlterDatabaseRefreshColl(AlterDatabaseRefreshCollStmt *stmt)
>
> I'm wondering why you changed this function to return an ObjectAddress rather
> than an Oid? There's no event trigger support for ALTER DATABASE, and the rest
> of similar utility commands also returns Oid.
Hmm, I was looking at RenameDatabase() and AlterDatabaseOwner(), which
return ObjectAddress.
